| Training macaques to cooperate during blood collection is a practicable and safe alternative to the traditional procedure implying forced restraint. It takes a cumulative total of about 1 hr to train an adult female or adult male rhesus macaque successfully to present a leg voluntarily and accept venipuncture in the homecage. Cooperative animals do not show the significant cortisol response and defensive reactions that typically occur in animals who are forcibly restrained during this common procedure. |
Blood collection is probably the most common handling procedure nonhuman primates are subjected to in research institutions. Traditionally, it is accomplished by forcibly restraining the subject because it is believed that "all monkeys are dangerous" (Ackerley & Stones, 1969, p. 207), that "nonhuman primates can be very difficult and even dangerous to handle," and that "restraint is therefore necessary and desirable to protect both the investigator and the animal" (Robbins, Zwick, Leedy, & Stearns, 1986, p. 68). Indeed, a subdued monkey will try to show self-defensive aggression. Therefore, "despite rigorous observance of all precautions, bites and scratches are frequent" (Valerio et al., 1969, p. 45; Zakaria, Lerche, Chomel, & Kass, 1996).
![]() |
|
|
Because of "adverse conditioning or fear" (Robbins, Zwick, Leedy, & Stearns, 1986, p. 68) enforced restraint during blood collection is an extremely alarming situation (see Figure 1) that affects physiological equilibrium, thereby increasing data variability and the number of research subjects needed to achieve statistically significant results (Brockway, Hassler, & Hicks, 1993). It has been shown that compulsory restraint changes normative:
In an attempt to reduce the stress reaction during blood collection, six individually caged adult (8 to 12 years old) female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) were trained to cooperate during femoral venipuncture in the homecage (see Figure 2). The subjects were used to being immobilized on a table for this procedure (see Figure 1).
![]() |
|
|
The effect of the training was assessed
by drawing two blood samplesthe first at 13:15 ±1 min and
the second at 13:30 ±1 minfrom each animal during the conventional
procedure involving forced restraint and, on another day, during
the refined procedure involving voluntary cooperation. The animals
lived in 70 cm × 75 cm × 77 cm large upper row cages.
They were fed commercial dry food at 7:30 and fruit at 15:00.
The macaques were subjected to no external disturbanceincluding
personnel walking in the hallwaysfor 1.5 hr before the first blood
drawing at 13:15. Both during the conventional and during the
refined procedure, venipuncture occurred 60 to 90 sec after the
caretaker had entered the animal room. The time lapse did not
differ between the two conditions (conventional 76 ± 12
sec vs. refined 73 ± 14 sec; t = 0.399, df =
5, p > .1).
The blood samples were analyzed for serum cortisol as an indicator
of stress. The first samples were used to assess basal levels;
the second samples served to evaluate the magnitude of the cortisol
response 15 min after venipuncture. Mean cortisol concentrations
of the first samples did not differ under both conditions, t
= 0.226, df =5,p > .1 (Table 1). Cortisol
concentrations of the second samples, however, were significantly
higher under the restraint condition than under the cooperation
condition, t = 3.910, df =5,p < .005 (Table
1). The magnitude of the endocrine response to venipuncture was
significant (+68%), t = 4.834, df = 5, p <
.001, when the subjects were restrained, but it was insignificant
(+14%), t = 1.135, df = 5, p > .1, when
they cooperated (see Table 1).
The following protocol was used to
train the subjects of this study as well as 12 adult pair-housed
female, 5 adult single-housed male, 10 adult pair-housed male
rhesus macaques, and 6 adult pair-housed female stump-tailed macaques
(M. arctoides). The animals were used to being immobilized
mechanically in their homecages during routine procedures such
as ketamine injection.
Step 1
Establish an affectionate relationship
with the trainee. She or he should come to the front of the cagerather
than retreat to the backwhen you enter the room. The subject must
trust you; only then will it be safe to proceed with the training.
Step 2
With the help of the squeeze-back,
the subject is confined in the front quarter of the cage. In this
position, freedom of movement is considerably restricted, but
the subject has enough leeway to turn around. The animal is reassuringly
talked to, gently scratched through the mesh, and offered some
raisins. After a minute or two, the squeeze-back is pushed back
and raisins again are offered. This exercise is repeated on different
days until the animal is relaxed and accepts the food reward.
Step 3
The subject again is restricted and
enticed with raisins and/or gently prodded to face the left or
right side of the cage. The subject's leg is touched and groomed
through the opening of the door. After a minute or two, the squeeze-back
is pushed back and raisins offered. This sequence of events is
repeated on different days until the animal stops retracting the
leg and accepts the food reward.
Step 4
The restricted subject's leg is gently
and firmly pulled through the opening of the door and held firmly
for about 1 minute. The squeeze-back is pushed back and the subject
rewarded with raisins. The goal of Step 4 is achieved when the
animal shows no signs of resistance such a trying to retract the
leg or to turn around.
| Blood
Sampling Procedure |
|
Difference (Significance) |
|
|
|
|
||
| Traditional
(restraint) Refined (cooperation) |
19.6 ± 3.0 µg/dl |
22.3 ± 5.0 µg/dl |
p < .1 |
Step 5
The squeeze-back is pulled only so
far as to prompt the trainee to come forward. The animal is in
full control of the situation and has enough room to turn around
freely and avoid being touched. The trainer encouragingly asks
the subject to present a leg behind or through the opening of
the door. An animal who refuses to cooperate is not punished in
any manner but simply does not receive a food reward. This exercise
is repeated on different days until the animal actively presents
a leg and shows no resistance during blood collection from the
femoral vein (see Figure 2) or saphenous vein. Once this goal
is achieved, the animal is praised and rewarded with raisins.
The training protocol outlined here was applied successfully not
only by the author but also by two animal caretakers, Vertein
(Vertein & Reinhardt, 1989) and Cowley (Reinhardt & Cowley,
1992).
The total number of training sessions
per animal ranged from 2 to 27. Individual training sessions lasted
from a few seconds to 5 minutes, depending on the trainee's responsiveness.
Cumulative time to reach the training goal (Step 5) ranged from
16 to 69 min with a mean of 38.5 min (see Table 2). There was
a tendency, statistically insignificant, for pair-housed subjects
requiring less training time than single-housed subjects; female
rhesus: t = 0.621, df = 16, p > .1; male
rhesus: t = 0.469, df = 13, p > .1 (Table
2). Females and males did not differ in the time needed to train
them; rhesus pair-housed: t = 0.025, df = 20, p
>.1; rhesus single-housed: t = 0.065, df =
9, p > .1 (see Table 2).
Although traditional blood sampling procedures usually require
at least two peopleone to help restrain the subject, one to puncture
a vein and draw blood (see Figure 1)only one person is required
to do this procedure with a trained subject (see Figure 2). Once
trained, all animals cooperated not only with the trainer but
also with the attending care personnel as well as with experienced
personnel from other facilities.
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Training macaques to cooperate voluntarily
during blood collection is a practical alternative to the traditional
procedure implying forced restraint and stress. Working with
a cooperative rather than against a resisting monkey
(a) eliminates the handler's risk of becoming the target of defensive
biting and scratching; (b) refines research methodology by controlling
the extraneous variable of stress; and (c) provides high quality
mental stimulation both to the animal and to the handling person.
The initial time investment in the training quickly pays off in
a safe handling procedure that no longer requires a second person
to control the resisting subject. It should be noted that the
idea of training macaques to cooperate during blood collection
is not new. There are reports from 10 different research facilities
where macaques have been trained voluntarily to present a leg
for blood collection (Reinhardt, 1997). Surprisingly, however,
this simple, yet effective, refinement technique is applied only
sporadically while the traditional technique relying on force
still is prevailing.
This project was partly supported by NIH Grant RR00167 to the Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center.
Ackerley, E. T., & Stones, P.
B. (1969). Safety procedures for handling monkeys. Laboratory
Animal Handbooks, 4, 207211.
Albrecht, E. D., Nightingale, M. S., & Townsley, J. D. (1978).
Stress-induced decrease in the serum concentration of progesterone
in the pregnant baboon. Journal of Endocrinology, 77, 425426.
Berendt, R., & Williams, T. D. (1971). The effect of restraint
and position upon selected respiratory parameters of two species
of Macaca. Laboratory Animal Science, 21, 502509.
Brockway, B. P., Hassler, C. R., & Hicks, N. (1993). Minimizing
stress during physiological monitoring. In S. M. Niemi, &
J. E. Willson (Eds.), Refinement and reduction in animal testing
(pp. 5669) Bethesda, MD: Scientists Center for Animal Welfare.
Bush, M., Custer, R., Smeller, J., & Bush, L. M. (1977). Physiologic
measures of nonhuman primates during physical restraint and chemical
immobilization. Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine
Association, 171, 866869.
Cope, F. W., & Polis, B. D. (1959). Increased plasma glutamic-oxalacetic
transaminase activity in monkeys due to nonspecific stress effect.
Journal of Aviation Medicine, 30, 9094.
Dettmer, E. L., Phillips, K. A., Rager, D. R., Bernstein, I.,
& Fragaszy, D. M. (1996). Behavioral and cortisol responses
to repeated capture and venipuncture in Cebus apella. American
Journal of Primatology, 38, 357362.
Elvidge, H., Challis, J. R. G., Robinson, J. S., Roper, C., &
Thorburn, G. D. (1976). Influence of handling and sedation on
plasma cortisol in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal
of Endocrinology, 70, 325326.
Fuller, G. B., Hobson, W. C., Reyes, F. I., Winter, J. S. D.,
& Faiman, C. (1984). Influence of restraint and ketamine anesthesia
on adrenal steroids, progesterone, and gonadotropins in rhesus
monkeys. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology
and Medicine, 175, 487490.
Golub, M. S., & Anderson, J. H. (1986). Adaptation of pregnant
rhesus monkeys to short-term chair restraint. Laboratory Animal
Science, 36, 507511.
Goncharov, N. P., Taranov, A. G., Antonichev, A. V., Gorlushkin,
V. M., Aso, T., Ckan, S. Z., et al. (1979). Effects of stress
on the profile of plasma steroids in baboons (Papio hamadryas).
Acta Endocrinologica, 90, 372384.
Goosen, D. J., Davies, J. H., Maree, M., & Dormehl, I. C.
(1984). The influence of physical and chemical restraint on the
physiology of the chacma baboon (Papio ursinus). Journal
of Medical Primatology, 13, 339351.
Hayashi, K. T., & Moberg, G. P. (1987). Influence of acute
stress and the adrenal axis on regulation of LH and testosterone
in the male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). American
Journal of Primatology, 12, 263273.
Ives, M., &Dack, G. M. (1956). "Alarm reaction"
and normal blood picture in Macaca mulatta. Journal
of Laboratory Clinical Medicine, 47, 723729.
Landi, M. S., Kissinger, J. T., Campbell, S. A., Kenney, C. A.,
& Jenkins, E. L. (1990). The effects of four types of restraint
on serum alanine aminotransferase and asparate aminotransferase
in the Macaca fascicularis. Journal of the American
College of Toxicology, 9, 517523.
Line, S. W., Markowitz, H., Morgan,
K. N., & Strong, S. (1991). Effect of cage size and environmental
enrichment on behavioral and physiological responses of rhesus
macaques to the stress of daily events. In M. A. Novak & A.
J. Petto (Eds.), Through the looking glass: Issues of psychological
well-being in captive nonhuman primates (pp. 160179) Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
Loomis, M. R., Henrickson, R. V., & Anderson, J. H. (1980).
Effects of ketamine hydrochloride on the hemogram of rhesus monkeys
(Macaca mulatta). Laboratory Animal Science, 30,
851853.
Manning, P. J., Lehner, N. D. M., Feldner, M. A., & Bullock,
B. C. (1969). Selected hematologic, serum chemical, and arterial
blood gas characteristics of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).
Laboratory Animal Care, 19, 831837.
Mason, J. W., Wool, M. S., Wherry, F. E., Pennington, L. L., Brady,
J. V., & Beer, B. (1968). Plasma growth hormone response to
avoidance in the monkey. Psychosomatic Medicine, 30, 760773.
Myers, B. A., Mendoza, S. P., & Cornelius, C. E. (1988). Elevation
of plasma glucagon levels in response to stress in squirrel monkeys:
Comparison of two subspecies (Saimiri sciureus boliviensis
and Saimiri sciureus sciureus). Journal of Medical
Primatology, 17, 205214.
Puri, C. P., Puri, V., & Anand-Kumar, T. C. (1981). Serum
levels of testosterone, cortisol, prolactin and bioactive luteinizing
hormone in adult male rhesus monkeys following cage-restraint
or anaesthetizing with ketamine hydrochloride. Acta Endocrinologica,
97, 118124.
Quadri, S. K., Pierson, C., & Spies, H. P. (1978). Effects
of centrally acting drugs on serum levels in rhesus monkeys. Neuroendocrinology,
27, 136147.
Reinhardt, V. (1991). Training adult male rhesus monkeys to actively
cooperate during in-homecage venipuncture. Animal Technology,
42, 1117.
Reinhardt, V. (1997). Training nonhuman primates to cooperate
during blood collection: Areview. Laboratory Primate Newsletter,
36(4), 14.
Reinhardt, V., & Cowley, D. (1992). In-homecage blood collection
from conscious stumptailed macaques. Animal Welfare, 1,
249255.
Reinhardt, V., & Reinhardt, A. (2000). Blood collection procedure
of laboratory primates: A neglected variable in biomedical research.
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 3, 321333.
Robbins, D. Q., Zwick, H., Leedy, M., & Stearns, G. (1986).
Acute restraint device for rhesus monkeys. Laboratory Animal
Science, 36, 6870.
Schnell, C. R., & Wood, J. M. (1993). Measurement of blood
pressure, heart rate, body temperature, ECG and activity by telemetry
in conscious unrestrained marmosets. Proceedings of the Fifth
Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations
Symposium, 107111.
Scientists Center for Animal Welfare. (1987). Consensus recommendations
on effective institutional animal care and use committees. Laboratory
Animal Science, 37, 1113.
Streett, J. W., & Jonas, A. M. (1982). Differential effects
of chemical and physical restraint on carbohydrate tolerance testing
in nonhuman primates. Laboratory Animal Science, 32, 263266.
Todd, H. E., Shideler, S. E., Laughlin, L. S., Overstreet, J.
W., Pohl, C. R., Byrd, W., et al. (1999). Application of an enzyme
immunoassay for urinary follicle-stimulating hormone to describe
the effects of an acute stressor at different stages of the menstrual
cycle in female laboratory macaques. American Journal of Primatology,
48, 135151.
Torii, R., Kitagawa, N., Nigi, H., & Ohsawa, N. (1993). Effects
of repeated restraint stress at 30-minute intervals during 24-hours
on serum testosterone, LH and glucocorticoids levels in male Japanese
monkeys (Macaca fuscata). Experimental Animal, 42,
6773.
Valerio, D. A., Miller, R. L., Innes, J. R. M., Courntey, K. D.,
Pallotta, A. J., & Guttmacher, R. M. (1969). Macaca mulatta.
Management of a laboratory breeding colony. New York: Academic.
Vertein, R., & Reinhardt, V. (1989). Training female rhesus
monkeys to cooperate during in-homecage venipuncture. Laboratory
Primate Newsletter, 28(2), 13.
Yasuda, M., Wolff, J., & Howard, C. F. (1988). Effects of
physical and chemical restraint on intravenous glucose tolerance
test in crested black macaques (Macaca nigra). American
Journal of Primatology, 15, 171180.
Zakaria, M., Lerche, N. W., Chomel, B. B., & Kass, P. H. (1996).
Accidental injuries associated with nonhuman primate exposure
at two Regional Primate Research Centers (U.S.A.): 19881993. Laboratory
Animal Science, 46, 298304.
Reproduced with permission
of Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
from Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6
(3), 189-197, 2003