AN ALTERNATIVE TO WOODCHIP
AS A FORAGING SUBSTRATE FOR TUFTED CAPUCHIN MONKEYS (CEBUS
APELLA)
M.C. RIVIELLO(a) and A. MISITI(b); (a)Polo Biologico Integrato,
C.N.R., Rome; (b)Istituto di Medicina Sperimentale, C.N.R., Rome,
Italy
To day we have a variety of techniques for environmental enrichment
used in captivity to enhance the psychological health of monkeys.
Many of those concern feeding strategies (BAYNE et al., 1992;
REINHARDT, 1993; MURCHISON, 1992). These techniques involve the
distribution of food during the day in such a way as to make it
harder to find in order to increase the feeding time. Generally,
they can be applied easily in every laboratory. Nevertheless,
sometimes, we have to make some changes to the original idea if
we do not want to renounce it.
We want to report own experience on the use, application and consequent
modification of the woodchip. This technique of environmental
enrichment consists of covering the floor to a depth of 4 cm with
woodchip into which some kind of foods are mixed (CHAMOVE and
ANDERSON, 1982).
Our laboratory, a short time after the introduction of woodchip,
became infested with domestic mice (Mus musculus). Not
wishing to give up, we decided to adequate the original idea changing
woodchip with "argilla espansa". In Italy, the "argilla
espansa" (expanded clay) is a material that is used in gardening
to improve the permeability of the soil. It is made of little
rocks, light and porous, of different size from 0.5 to 1 cm. and
it could be comparable with lava rock.
The result was excellent. it provided an ideal substrate in which
the primates could search for food and mice were no longer attracted
to the laboratory. Moreover the "argilla espansa" is
light and therefore easily handled by the monkeys, it is porous
and dries in a short time, it does not produce dust. Therefore
it can be a good substitute for woodchip. We wish to encourage
the use of "argilla espansa" as a substitute for woodchip
in laboratories in which it is not possible to use it. In particular,
with our example we want to encourage those who work with captive
monkeys not to abandon the idea of an environmental device only
because it could seem inapplicable in own laboratory. We believe
that we must look for alternative ways of implementation of principles
whose benefits have been proven.
This article originally appeared in Primate Report 42: 24
(1995).
Reprinted with permission of the Editor.