Elephant Cruelty Under the Big Top Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus Finally exposed in federal court trial
By Tracy Silverman, Esq. "The elephants I grew to know
and love at the circus were beaten daily with
sharp bull hooks and chained like prisoners for
hours on end." -Tom Rider, After nearly nine years
of intense
legal wrangling, the Animal Welfare Institute’s
(AWI) landmark case against Ringling Bros. and
Barnum & Bailey Circus’ parent company,
Feld Entertainment, Inc., for elephant
mistreatment finally went to trial on February
4 in the U.S. District Court for the District
of Columbia. AWI and its co-plaintiffs (the
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty
to Animals, the Fund for Animals, the Animal
Protection Institute, and former Ringling Bros.
barn man Tom Rider) were represented by the
public interest law firm of Meyer Glitzenstein
& Crystal at the trial which lasted
approximately six weeks. Since the Asian elephants that
Ringling Bros. uses to perform in its shows
across the country have been listed by the U.S.
government since 1976 as an endangered species,
this case was brought under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA), a federal law which protects
all such animals. Section 9 of the ESA
prohibits the "take" of any endangered species,
which is explicitly defined to include "harm,"
"wound," and "harass." As alleged in the lawsuit and
argued at trial, Ringling Bros. harms, wounds
and harasses its elephants in violation of the
ESA in two specific ways: 1) by the routine
practice of hitting the elephants with
instruments including bull hooks (also known as
ankuses) in order to force the elephants to do
what they are told, as well as to correct,
discipline and punish them if they fail to do
so; 2) by the use of chains to routinely
confine the elephants for prolonged periods of
time on hard surfaces. Evidence of Ringling Bros.’ Routine Bull Hook
Use Over the years, Ringling Bros.
has consistently denied that it routinely hits
its elephants with instruments such as a bull
hook, a two- to three-foot-long club with a
sharp metal hook and pointer on the end.
However, the evidence presented at trial
clearly shows otherwise. In fact, when Feld
Entertainment CEO Kenneth Feld took the stand,
he testified that not only has he personally
observed the Ringling Bros. handlers strike the
elephants with bull hooks, but that all of the
handlers engage in this practice. Evidence that the elephants,
whose skin is particularly sensitive in certain
areas commonly targeted by handlers, are
routinely struck with bull hooks was also
elicited through the testimony of several
former Ringling Bros. employees. Tom Rider, who
worked for the circus for two and half years,
feeding and cleaning up after the elephants,
described the bull hook use he observed as
"frequent" and "excessive." Recounting two
specific instances to the court, Rider
described one occasion when an elephant was
repeatedly hit after refusing to lie down on
command, resulting in more than twenty bull
hook marks on her body, and another occasion
when an elephant was beaten with a bull hook
for more than 20 minutes because she was
rattling the chain on her leg used to keep her
restrained. Rider also testified that "wonder
dust" was often applied to mask the elephants'
cuts and wounds. Other former Ringling Bros.
employees corroborated Rider’s testimony,
including former animal care providers Archele
Hundley and Robert Tom, Jr., who testified that
the Ringling Bros. elephants endure daily bull
hook abuse. They both described a severe
beating when a handler rammed a bull hook into
an elephant’s ear and hit her for more than 35
minutes because she would not lie down on
command. Similarly, Margaret Tom, who worked
for Ringling Bros. from 2005 through 2006,
cited another bull hook beating that resulted
when an elephant defecated on a dancer during a
show. Frank Hagan, who is now deceased,
worked for Ringling Bros. on and off between
1993 and 2004. He testified in a videotaped
deposition that the handlers use bull hooks
aggressively and forcefully and that there were
times when he saw handlers swing bull hooks
like baseball bats at the elephants. Former
Ringling Bros. animal caretaker Gerald Ramos,
who left the circus after one week in 2006,
also testified by way of deposition that he
witnessed a baby elephant whacked on the head
in such a manner. Further testimony regarding bull
hook cruelty inflicted on the Ringling Bros.
elephants was provided by former San Jose,
Calif., Police Sergeant Lanette Williams, who
attended inspections of the circus when it came
to California. Sergeant Williams stated that
she observed elephants with lacerations and
puncture wounds caused by bull hooks and
described seeing an elephant "stabbed" with a
bull hook by a Ringling Bros. handler when she
attended an inspection in 2001. Some of the most horrifying
evidence was presented in the form of video
footage, some of which was taken by witness Pat
Cuviello, a member of Citizens for Cruelty-Free
Entertainment. Mr. Cuviello, who has been
monitoring the circus for about 20 years, took
the stand and described how the elephants are
hooked, hit, jabbed and threatened with bull
hooks. He also testified to having seen
Ringling Bros. handlers use brooms and pliers
on the elephants. The name of Ringling Bros.
employee and long-time elephant handler, Troy
Metzler, often came up at trial before he even
took the stand. Nicknamed "Captain Hook" for
his frequent and exceptionally cruel use of
bull hooks, Metzler was filmed striking a young
elephant under the chin and on the trunk,
footage that was entered into evidence. An
internal Feld Entertainment e-mail stating that
Metzler was observed hitting an elephant three
to five times before using an electric prod on
her within public view was also entered into
evidence. Evidence of Ringling Bros.’ Routine
Chaining For years, Feld Entertainment has
vehemently denied allegations put forth in this
case that its elephants are chained for the
vast majority of their lives. In fact, Feld
Entertainment maintains on its website that
"Ringling Bros. elephants spend most of their
day moving about freely in their enclosures and
in the arena …" and that "… most of their
waking hours are spent at play, socializing,
exercising and learning new routines." However,
an overwhelming amount of evidence was
presented at trial establishing that these
highly social and intellectually curious
animals, who are biologically wired to be on
the move, are in fact routinely chained for
extended periods of time. In addition to the testimony of
former Ringling Bros. employees that the
elephants are chained by two legs for the
majority of the day, every day, and sometimes
for days at a time when traveling on trains,
Gary Jacobson, general manager for Ringling
Bros.’ euphemistically named Center for
Elephant Conservation (CEC) admitted that the
elephants maintained at that facility spend 16
consecutive hours chained by two legs on
concrete flooring every day, while other
elephants are chained daily for 22 consecutive
hours on concrete flooring. Such testimony
flies in the face of Feld Entertainment’s
public relations materials, which boast that
the elephants kept at the so-called CEC "can
roam and socialize to their heart’s
content." Video footage of the elephants
chained in barns, on trains, and outdoors was
also presented at trial. While outside, the
animals are at times lined up and chained to a
central stake and placed on "picket lines"
reminiscent of chain gangs. Videotaped footage
subpoenaed from Washington, D.C.’s MCI Center
(now renamed the Verizon Center) showed the
elephants chained for prolonged periods of time
on a concrete floor. Corroborating the testimonial and
visual evidence of Ringling Bros.’ routine
chaining practices were Feld Entertainment’s
own transportation orders showing how much time
the elephants spend on the trains that
transport them from venue to venue across the
country for about 40 weeks each year. These
records reveal that the elephants are chained
on unyielding train surfaces for an average of
more than 26 consecutive hours at a time, and
that they are often chained on the trains this
way for stretches lasting 60 to 70 hours—and
sometimes lasting as long as 90 to 100
consecutive hours. Evidence that Ringling Bros.’
Routine Practices Harm,
Wound and Harass the
Elephants As lead counsel, Katherine Meyer
indicated in her opening statement, "Feld
Entertainment places a high premium on the
illusion for the public that the endangered
elephants it uses in its circus are happy,
healthy and thriving." This illusion, however,
was broken down over the course of the
six-week-long trial as evidence of the physical
and psychological harm caused to the elephants
unfolded day after day. Despite statements made on the
stand by Feld Entertainment’s witnesses that
bull hooks used at Ringling Bros. Circus do not
hurt the elephants, an internal letter written
by a Ringling Bros. animal behaviorist revealed
that an elephant was "… dripping blood all over
the arena floor during the show from being
hooked," while another internal Feld
Entertainment document authored by a Ringling
Bros. veterinary technician indicated that
"[a]fter this morning’s baths, at least four of
the elephants came in with multiple abrasions
and lacerations from the hooks." Additionally,
Ringling Bros.’ handler Robert "Sonny" Ridley,
who has been with the circus for almost 40
years, stated in his deposition that he sees
puncture wounds caused by bull hooks at least
three to four times a month, and stated in a
sworn affidavit to the USDA that he also sees
hook boils (infected puncture wounds caused by
bull hooks) on the elephants an average of
twice a week. Several of the world’s leading
experts on elephants testified as to the
psychological harm caused to the elephants as a
result of Ringling Bros.’ routine practices.
With more than 30 years of experience studying
elephants in the wild, Dr. Joyce Poole
explained that the bull hook injures and
harasses the elephants emotionally by making
them so fearful of exhibiting their natural
behaviors (such as exploring their surroundings
and socializing with other elephants) that they
cease to act like normal elephants. She and
others, including Ros Clubb, Ph.D., of Oxford
University, a leading expert on stereotypic
behavior in elephants, also testified that the
repetitive swaying, bobbing and weaving
exhibited by the Ringling Bros. elephants can
be attributed to the prolonged periods of time
they spend confined on chains and is evidence
that they are experiencing stress and poor
welfare. The testimony of Philip Ensley,
D.V.M., on the health of the elephants was
particularly compelling. Dr. Ensley, a
board-certified veterinarian who worked for the
San Diego Wildlife Park and Zoo for 29 years,
testified against Feld Entertainment based on
his attendance at two court-ordered elephant
inspections and the 1,300 hours it took him to
review the medical records of all the Ringling
Bros. elephants. Though Feld Entertainment
tried to withhold this critical documentation
from the court, the corporation finally turned
it over after two separate court orders. Dr.
Ensley testified that while some of the
elephants have more serious health histories
than others, all of the elephants appear to
suffer from similar conditions, including
lameness, stiffness, arthritis, osteoarthritis
(degenerative foot disease), pressure sores,
abrasions, lacerations, lesions, and overly
worn feet, as well as nail bed cracks and
abscesses. He indicated that these conditions
appear not just in the older elephants, but
also uncharacteristically in the younger ones,
and that such conditions are precipitated by
their routine handling by Ringling Bros.
staff. The defense attempted to counter
Dr. Ensley’s testimony with that of Ringling
Bros. Chair of Veterinary Care and Director of
Research and Conservation, Dennis Schmitt,
D.V.M. Dr. Schmitt testified that the Ringling
Bros. elephants are "bright, alert, healthy
[and] active." However, he later admitted that
some of these same elephants suffer from
tuberculosis, bull hook marks, sprains,
strains, nail cracks, nail bed abscesses,
stiffness, arthritis, and weight loss. While the evidentiary portion of
the trial has concluded, the parties are now
required to file some additional briefs with
the court. The Honorable Emmet Sullivan, the
judge presiding over the case, may also ask the
parties to come back to court for further
argument once final briefs have been submitted.
Whether or not the endangered Asian elephants
in the Ringling Bros. Circus will be afforded
the protections outlined in the ESA is in the
hands of Judge Sullivan, but regardless of the
outcome—or the potentially lengthy appeals
process—one thing is for certain: the cruelties
under the big top have finally been exposed for
the whole world to see.
former Ringling
Bros. employee
