EDITOR'S NOTE:
Dr. Love wrote me the following personal
notes:
"We, the people involved in animal care, are trying to develop
improved methods of keeping our animals, methods which will take
into account more of the animals' behavioral needs. We now have
a large number of rabbits in runs which permit them to have indoor
and outdoor space. This allows them to jump, run, sit up and have
all the social interaction they need. We believe that although
our laboratory animals have not encountered a predator in generations,
they still have the need for a haven when they are startled. Gordon
Gray describes a box which we place in the large guinea pig bins
and which serves as a place for them to duck into when they are
startled. It provides us with a very useful tool because we make
use of this response to catch the guinea pigs without having them
fleeing all around the bin. We believe that the guinea pigs are
much less excitable in this set up and we are putting together
the study to demonstrate this.
"Jenny Boyd describes some additions we made to our mouse
boxes, to provide cover and variety in the box, which provided
us with some unexpected information. We found that the mice would
use some of the additions as toilets, hence the title 'The Toilet.-Trained
Mouse.' Again we have been able to benefit from a behavioral train
since it is easier to change the 'toilets' regularly than the
whole cage and the smell of mouse urine has been greatly reduced.
"We still have problems to overcome with all of our attempts
to modify the way we keep our animals. However the technicians
are enthusiastic about these approaches and so we persist. The
modifications are not suitable for every situation and it is quite
probable that others have developed solutions which are equally
good or better. Thus the value of your journal."
Housing for Rabbits
JAMES A. LOVE
European rabbits from which most of our laboratory strains have originated, are social animals often living in warrens of several hundred animals. In most laboratory situations, rabbits are kept isolated in cages which do not permit the full range of behaviour to be exhibited.
We have attempted to correct this deficiency by keeping rabbits in either large tubs which can accommodate six or more animals or in indoor/outdoor pens. Provision has been made in each case for a covered area under which the animals can run when they are startled.
![]() |
![]() |
| A current outside run, where rabbits have been seen piled atop each other, sunning themselves. |
|
Shavings are used for bedding in the tubs, which must be deep enough to prevent the animals from springing out. Sawdust is provided in the indoor/outdoor pens in the inside only. Cleaning is required twice a week for the tubs while the pens are partially cleaned daily and totally twice each week. In the pens, the rabbits seem to urinate mostly outside and they defecate mostly close to the food dishes. By judiciously placing the food dishes, most of the feces can be kept close to the drains and so the daily cleanup is accomplished very quickly.
![]() |
| Here is the way Dr. Love housed rabbits successfully and comfortably, in lobster tubs when he worked for Dalhousie University. |
The rabbits are fed normal rabbit food but each day, lettuce or
the leafy parts of hay are given to ensure that all the animals
in each group are eating.
The rabbits in the pens and tubs are not as heavy as their more
sedentary caged counterparts. They run and skip and sometimes
fight although we find that rabbits which have been together from
a young age fight less than the older rabbits. Additionally, younger
rabbits settle down more quickly to the `open' life than do older
rabbits, some of which never seem to become used to the extra
space.
In both the pens and the tubs, rabbits lie together and engage
in mutual grooming. The amount of loose hair is considerably less
in the penned rabbits than in those where the environment is controlled.
The ability to move inside or out permits more variability in
the temperature range acceptable to the rabbit, a factor which
the rabbit can control.
Disease problems, other than fighting injuries, appear to be less
frequent than in the caged animals. Initial studies suggest that
hairballs are much less common in the rabbits in tubs than those
in cages. Growth is slower in the penned animals, i.e. growth
gauged by weight gain. Identifying individual animals is a problem
and we have not yet found the ideal technique.
Tubs are cheaper than the traditional stainless steel caging and
permit greater behavioural expression by the animals. Pens are
an extension of the tubs and are only applicable in certain circumstances.
The animals are easy to maintain and labour costs may be considerably
less than for stainless steel caging.
The requirements of the experimental design often put constraints
on the type of housing suitable for our experimental animals.
However, in many situations, it is possible to provide more for
the animals than basic food and water and to allow them to indulge
in normal behavioural activities without jeopardizing the goals
of the study.
Guinea Pigs
GORDON GRAY
Although they have been bred in captivity for many generations,
guinea pigs respond to a startle by seeking a place to hide. In
providing such a place, we have been able to take advantage of
this trait to help with the management of the animal.
We maintain our breeding colony, in large plastic bins suspended
about 58cm above the floor. Each bin has one male and five females.
The bins, which measure 150cm x 90cm x 48cm, have a hole in one
end through which the shavings can be swept into a garbage pail.
Initial attempts to provide the animals with a covered area for
refuge showed that the guinea pigs adopted the shelter very quickly
and would dart under cover when startled. We soon realized that
this was a most useful behaviour when it came to catching the
animals in these large bins.
We constructed boxes as shown in the photograph. They measure
61 cm x 42cm x 30cm and have a floor and a removable top. The
sliding door show is not present except as required. The door
opening was made so that heavily pregnant guinea pigs could still
go in and out without difficulty. The floor is flush without any
obstructions to make cleaning difficult, and the boxes pass through
the cage washer.
Catching the guinea pigs is a matter
of closing the door once they scamper inside and opening the top
of the box. This eliminates the scramble which occurred previously.
During cleaning, the box full of guinea pigs is lifted out of
the bin.
Once they are used to the boxes, the guinea pigs often dart to
the door when they are startled and then look back for the cause
of the panic. Pregnant females give birth in the boxes and the
young often do not emerge until they are about five days old.
However the young may be checked by lifting the lid.
![]() |
The advantages of the boxes include:
There are some potential disadvantages namely:
|
Mice
JENNIFER BOYD
As part of an overall effort to improve the housing of laboratory
animals, small plastic water bottles were added to mouse boxes
to determine if they could provide some novelty in the environment.
In some cases, the bottles were added inside the box and in some
cases they were added to the outside with only the neck of the
bottle protruding into the box. Both large and small mouse boxes
were used. It quickly became apparent that the mice would use
the bottles either as urinals or for nesting. Generally, if there
was a single bottle and a double in a cage, the single was used
as a urinal while the double was used as a nest and bolt hole.
The mice carried the nesting material in themselves.
The greatest acceptance occurred in
the larger mouse boxes with the bottles in the inside. Small boxes
with inside bottles or outside bottles received limited acceptance.
Pregnant mice delivered inside the nesting bottle and the young
remained there for the first two weeks. The "urinals"
were used exclusively once they were adopted and this took from
one to four days for naive mice. An experienced mouse with the
naive mice shortened the learning period. If, however, the urinals
were not cleaned and a pool of urine accumulated, the mice blocked
the entrance with sawdust and proceeded to urinate in the corners
of the box. Swiss Webster. Balb/c and C57Bl/6 mice all used the
bottles in the same way.
The smell of ammonia from mouse boxes is one of the problems in
the animal house. Frequent changing of cages will minimize the
odor but increases the labour. The unexpected benefit from this
trial was that the smell was considerably lessened since the urine
was contained in the urinals and was generally free from fecal
contamination. the source of urea splitting bacteria. Changing
the bottles was much less laborious than changing the cages. Cages
were changed much less frequently with less disturbance to the
animals.
The mice used the nesting bottle as a nest and a bolt hole. When
it came time to change the cage, all mice could be transferred
by transferring the nesting bottle.
Checking the mice in the nesting bottle was a little difficult.
From the photograph, the nesting bottle can be seen to be the
two "urinals" end to end. The bottoms had been removed
and the bottles were held together with tape on two sides. It
was possible to release the tape from one side and with the other
acting as a hinge, to open the nest and examine the contents.
This needs further work as the mice chew at the tape eventually.
![]() |
|
An advantage of the nesting box for mice may be a reduction in
the costs for heating mouse rooms. Generally, mice are maintained
at a temperature of 22 -25 C. However this does not permit them
to control their own environmental temperature. Others have shown
that mice nests are constructed to reflect the ambient temperature
and if the ambient temperature is high, poor nests are constructed.
If the nesting bottle allows the mice to establish their own optimum
environment, then the ambient temperature could be reduced with
considerable reductions in heating costs. We have not explored
this avenue in detail.
We feel that the provisions of the nesting bottles and urinals
has provided the animals with some novelty in their environment
and has had advantages from a management viewpoint. Our cage size
for the "toilet-trained mice" has been 19" x 10.5"
x 8".
Reproduced with permission of the editor. Published in Humane Innovations and Alternatives Vol. 2, 1988, p.47-50.