RECOGNIZING that the Western Gray Whale
population is one of the world’s smallest populations of large
whales, with about 100 individuals remaining, including only
23 reproductive females, and that this population is therefore
listed by IUCN as Critically Endangered;
CONCERNED that the population was reduced to
this very low level by over-hunting in the early part of the
20th century and now is
facing new threats from oil and gas development on its only
known feeding ground;
FURTHER CONCERNED that the near-shore feeding
ground is less than 70 km long and up to 10 km wide and that
this habitat is critical to population survival as it is the
only known place where females with calves feed and calves are
weaned;
GREATLY TROUBLED that large oil companies
Sakhenergy (Shell, Mitsubishi and Mitsui), Exxon and BP, and
their Russian partners, have started major oil-development
projects in the waters off Northeastern Sakhalin Island,
Russian Federation, that are directly surrounding and
encroaching upon the feeding habitat of Western Gray Whales
and that the cumulative impacts of these projects
(individually, collectively and sequentially) have not been
considered explicitly by the oil companies or by their
international lenders;
AWARE that Western Gray Whales feed primarily
on benthic organisms, that their feeding ground (the Piltun
Area) is very limited, and that the risk posed by a major oil
spill to the near-shore ecosystem and benthic community is
very high as containment of oil would be extremely difficult
and prevailing currents in the area could cause spilled oil to
spread across the whale feeding habitat;
NOTING and welcoming the concerns for this
population expressed by the International Whaling Commission (IWC)
in Resolution 2001–3, which urges that "every effort must be
made to reduce anthropogenic mortality to zero and to reduce
various types of anthropogenic disturbances to the lowest
possible level";
MINDFUL of further similar concerns expressed
by the IWC in subsequent years;
RECALLING that the IUCN Species Survival
Commission (SSC) Cetacean Specialist Group, in its current
Conservation Action Plan, Dolphins,
Whales and Porpoises: 2002–2010 Conservation Action Plan for
the World’s Cetaceans (2003), has identified
the population of Western Gray Whales as one of several
populations of great whales that are severely depleted;
FURTHER RECALLING that the SSC Cetacean
Specialist Group has provided scientific and technical advice
to the proponents of the Sakhalin oil development projects
regarding risk assessment and mitigation; and
NOTING that IUCN has undertaken an independent
scientific review of the impacts on Western Gray Whales of oil
and gas development plans on and near Sakhalin Island;
The World Conservation Congress at its 3rd
Session in
Bangkok, Thailand, 17–25 November 2004:
1. REQUESTS the Director General, with the
assistance of IUCN’s members, Commissions, and Council, to
promote the protection of Western Gray Whales throughout their
range, particularly their feeding ground off Sakhalin Island;
2. CAUTIONS that any additional negative
impact on Western Gray Whales could lead to their extinction;
3. URGES all the range state governments
(including China, Japan, Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea,
Republic of Korea, and the Russian Federation) to immediately
develop and implement their own national action plans for the
conservation of Western Gray Whales and their habitat;
4. ENCOURAGES all involved oil companies to
establish independent monitoring programmes that meet
international best-practice standards, as agreed by the SSC
Cetacean Specialist Group, and that are subjected to
independent review by parties with no vested interests;
5. EMPHASIZES the importance of developing and
implementing effective mitigation measures that reduce
potential anthropogenic impacts to the lowest possible level,
in accordance with IWC Resolution 2001–3, prior to the onset
of any major construction work on the Sakhalin Shelf in 2005;
and
6. REQUESTS the Russian authorities to
establish an area which is seasonally closed to activities
which may have an adverse impact on Western Gray Whales
(mothers and calves) during the time that they are present
each year.
State and agency members United States
refrained from engaging in deliberations on this motion and
took no national government position on the motion as adopted
for reasons given in the US General Statement on the IUCN
Resolution Process.