Animal Welfare Act
Enforcement:
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Good: After more than five years, modest
regulatory changes were finalized which will close existing loopholes and
improve USDA’s ability to enforce the Animal Welfare Act (AWA),
particularly at the premises of dealers and exhibitors.
Bad: USDA will not be finalizing a
much-needed policy regarding training and handling of potentially
dangerous animals (e.g. lions, tigers, bears, and elephants). Apparently
the agency capitulated to pressure from the exhibition industry.
Ugly: USDA has ceased providing the public
with copies of inspection reports of dealer, research, and exhibitor
premises. Now this data will have to be obtained via the Freedom of
Information Act, and there is a three year backlog.
Charles River Labs Charged with Animal
Cruelty
Four years ago, The Coulston Foundation of
Alamogordo, NM, under threat of a USDA case for violating the Animal
Welfare Act, gave the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 288 of its
chimps. NIH decided to let Charles River Labs take care of the apes and
provided a $42 million contract for ten years. According to a September 7
criminal complaint filed against Charles River Labs and two of its
officials, on three separate occasions chimps suffering grave wounds were
left in the "care" of untrained night security guards. Two chimps died.
Thanks to In Defense of Animals for providing
authorities with key information.
|