The sheep industry is locked in a serious debate over the extreme docking of sheep tails for shows and livestock exhibitions. In the United States, shepherds typically cut lamb tails to a length of 1 or 2 inches to prevent wool maggots later in life. The practice of short docking for the “show circuit” is different—the entire tail is cut off right at the body wall, along with one or two vertebrae of the spine. It is well known within the sheep industry that short docking is an unnecessary practice that can cause serious health problems, pain and suffering. Seven national veterinary, scientific and animal science organizations recommend the practice of short docking be stopped.
In 2003, faculty from five state universities studied the effect of short docking on the health of sheep.1 The “Thomas Study” found an increase in rectal prolapses in sheep who were short docked (a picture comparing short, medium and long docking can be found in the Thomas article on page 2728). The researchers concluded, “Ultra short docking is a cosmetic fad promoted in the show ring that compromises the health and well-being of sheep. The practice should be abandoned.”
| Short docking policies and practices at universities participating in the Thomas study.1 | ||
| University Sheep Flock | Cooperative Extension (4-H) | |
| Iowa State University | No written policy, lambs short docked (2007). | No policy. ISU sheep program selling short docked “club” lambs (2007). |
| Ohio State University | Written policy banning short docking (2000). Photo of short docked sheep on university sponsored website (2006). | No policy. Short docked sheep at 2006 fairs. |
| Oregon State University | Policy banning short docking (2000). Included in Standard Operating Procedures (2006). | Written policy (2001) made optional (2004). No policy at State Fair (2005). |
| Texas A & M University | No response to our request. Short docked sheep on university website (2007). | No response to our request. Short docked sheep at 2006 livestock shows. |
| University of Wisconsin at Madison | No written policy, practices medium docking. Photo of short docked sheep on university sponsored website (2007). | No policy. Short docked sheep at 2006 fairs. |
There are several causes of rectal prolapses. Short docking is particularly a problem because the caudal vertebrae of the spine and the cords that stabilize the rectum and anal sphincter are removed. Destroying this support system increases the chance that any straining (such as coughing) can push the rectum out of the body. Fixing a rectal prolapse is painful. With valuable show lambs, a prolapse may be amputated or sutured. In some cases, a torturous series of iodine injections is given to try to build up enough scar tissue to re-stabilize the rectum.
Short docking only exists in the show circuit. At fairs, sheep are judged on how much meat they could produce at market. Like a body builder flexing to display muscle angles, sheep exhibitors use techniques in the show ring to highlight muscle definition. By removing the animal’s entire tail, competitors want to create the illusion of the level back and full leg of a better meat lamb. Why? A winning sheep can sell for as much as $14,000, and winning builds up the breeder’s reputation.
4-H and Future Farmers of America (FFA) offer youth hands-on experience through club projects that end with demonstrations at fairs and expositions. 4-H is a US Department of Agriculture (USDA) program administered by Cooperative Extension at each land grant university. County Extension Agents staff local 4-H programs and are employees of the university. FFA, in the US Department of Education (USDOE), is authorized by the National Vocational Education Acts. Leaders are agriculture teachers in local school districts and universities. Surprisingly, there is no national 4-H or FFA policy on tail docking, and Cooperative Extension Services in only 10 states ban the practice in sheep projects.
![]() |
![]() |
| This type of short dock, whereby the animal‘s tail is cut off entirely at the body wall, is typical in the show ring. | This ewe’s tail has been docked to the typical length of 1 or 2 inches. Her lamb’s tail has not yet been docked. |
In June of 2006, the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) wrote to the president and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) chair at each campus that sponsored the Thomas Study. Our goal was to see how these institutions carried out the recommendations published by their faculty. We asked about policies for university sheep flocks and Cooperative Extension 4-H Sheep Projects.
We found that only two campuses ban short docking, and all five states still allow short docking in 4-H sheep projects. AWI also contacted the national 4-H and FFA headquarters, calling for leadership to stop the practice. Universities, the National 4-H Headquarters and the National FFA Organization all deny authority over what happens in the show ring.
The show ring today is more than a place for kids to display their skills—it has become a business. Some universities breed club lambs for sale; some private breeders educate youth on the care of sheep. Responsibility for change rests with administrators who design protocols and educational tools for sheep programs, including IACUC and Cooperative Extension faculty at universities. Ultimately, “[Cooperative] Extension will have to decide if it will promote and educate based on what the research base tells us, or whether it will promote and educate based on what some club lamb producers tell us. These are often two divergent trains of thought.”2
| YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE |
| • On Campus: Take pictures of show lambs at fairs and university agriculture schools. Send them to the campus IACUC and ask for written policies that ban short docking in all university programs. (Send us a copy too so we can help!) • At the Fair: Encourage the Cooperative Extension Service to ban short docking in 4-H sheep projects. Ask the USDA and the USDOE to establish a national standard for 4-H and FFA projects. • Public Policy: Add short docking to animal welfare laws. Work with fair boards to strengthen animal cruelty policies at the fairgrounds. • Ally Building: Support commercial sheep producers calling for responsible improvements in docking practices in the show ring. AWI is interested in working with activists organizing to stop short docking in their states; if you need help, please let us know. If you would like to join our work in Iowa, Ohio, Oregon, Texas or Wisconsin, please contact the AWI office. |
We commend the US Animal Health Association, the American Association of Small Ruminant Practitioners, the American Veterinary Medical Association, the American Sheep Industry Association, the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Institute for Animal Agriculture, and the National Lamb Feeders Association for taking a stand against short docking. We also thank Cooperative Extension departments within universities, agriculture educators and industry leaders for their efforts to ban short docking in California, Idaho, Maryland, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming.
1 Thomas, et al. (2003) Length of docked tail and the incidence of rectal prolapse in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 81: 2725-2732. http://ag.arizona.edu/pima/4-h/projects/sheep/tail_docking_rectal_prolapses.pdf
2 Goodwin, J., et al. (2003) Development of objective lamb tail-dock measurement device. http://www.animalagriculture.org/proceedings/2003%20Proc/Goodwin.htm
Consumption First? Wildlife Trade Policy in the United States
Bobcats: Protected Yet Persecuted
Behind the Wall: Smithfield and the Victory of Illusion, by Tom Garrett
Bird Flu: A Virus of Our Own Hatching
This Land is Their Land: How Corporate Farms Threaten the World
Legislators Support American Horses

The US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) estimated in 2004 that
there were 700,000 to 1.5 million adult bobcats living in the United States.
Considering that only four states have even attempted to estimate the size of
their bobcat populations, there is no evidence to validate this ballpark figure
or to justify the agency’s belief that the population is even larger today. With
significantly more bobcats being killed now than even five years ago, claims by
most states and the FWS that these bobcat populations are stable or increasing
are not credible. By contrast, the International Union for the Conservation of
Nature’s 2006 Red List of Threatened Species indicates that bobcat populations
are in decline. The bobcat is one of many species whose future may rest on the
outcome of this summer’s Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
of Wild Fauna and Flora meeting, since its Appendix II protections are now at
stake.
Photo by Susan C. Morse